Search This Blog

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Kilgour tours Brusells EU, Berlin, London and Washington DC presenting Report on Organ Harvesting from living Falun Gong


There is no issue in Communist China today that is more troubling than the harvesting of organs from prisoners of conscience, particularly the well-known cases of Falun Gong practitioners. Equally troubling is the moral predicament in which many participating surgeons have found themselves trapped. They vowed to dedicate their lives to saving people, but now are helpless accomplices to state-sanctioned murder. To understand exactly why and what has happened over the years, take a look at this enlightened piece from CBC titled 'Falun Gong: A young spiritual discipline with a turbulent history'.

Meanwhile in Canada, former Member of Parliament David Kilgour and renowned human rights lawyer David Matas recently published a report on their findings regarding the organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners.

“We have concluded that the government of China and its agencies in numerous parts of the country, in particular hospitals but also detention centers and ‘people’s courts,’ since 1999 have put to death a large but unknown number of Falun Gong prisoners of conscience. Their vital organs, including hearts, kidneys, livers and corneas, were virtually simultaneously seized involuntarily for sale at high prices, sometimes to foreigners, who normally face long waits for voluntary donations of such organs in their home countries.” (full report).

Here's an update on their effort to deliver the report where it matters.


News Update

Canadians Lead in Investigation of Organ Harvesting from Falun Gong prisoners of conscience in China

Kilgour on tour to present report at European Parliament and in Berlin,London and Washington, D.C.

July 13, 2006 (Brussels) David Kilgour, former Secretary of State (Asia-Pacific) of Canada, on Wednesday made a presentation to the Delegation of the European Parliament to China in Brussels on the investigation report into organ harvesting from Falun Gong prisoners of conscience in China co-authored by Mr. Kilgour himself and Mr. David Matas, international human rights lawyer from Winnipeg, Canada.

Mr. Kilgour and Mr. Matas' independent report found that vital organs are being seized from detained Falun Gong practitioners across China. At the same time, a Vice-President of the European Parliament, the Hon. Edward McMillan-Scott, reported on his organ harvesting fact-finding trip to China in May 2006. The two reports on the organ harvesting issue complement each other.

Today, Mr. Kilgour, joined by Mr. McMillan-Scott, appeared at a press conference in Brussels to further detail their investigation on the crime of organ harvesting occurring in Communist China.

Mr. Kilgour will be presenting the report in Berlin, London and Washington, D.C. over the next week.

To contact Mr. Kilgour in Europe:

Waltraud (German): 011 49 173 313 55 32 (Mobile)

For Friday (July 14) Zek (UK): 011 44 7910 785 079 (Mobile)

Next Monday and Tuesday (July 17, 18)

Related Article:

EP Vice-President's Investigative Report on Organ Harvesting in China

To view the report, please visit: http://investigation.go.saveinter.net

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Motion Hearing of Historic Lawsuit against Jiang Zemin for Torture

Look here for an update- (Toronto) –A motion will be heard in Ontario Superior Court on Friday July 14, on an important procedural issue in the historic $20 million civil lawsuit against former head of China Jiang Zemin and four other key Chinese officials for torture of Falun Gong practitioners now living in Canada. One of the plaintiffs, Professor Kunlun Zhang, was a Canadian citizen at the time of his detention and torture in China.

The motion is to dispense with the need to serve the defendants with the statement of claim and other court material, on the basis that all possible means of service have been attempted but China has refused to accept the documents. If successful, the plaintiffs will then be able to seek a final judgment against the defendants on the merits of the case.

The hearing comes on the heels of a Canadian independent report released last Thursday that the Chinese government and its agencies have harvested vital organs and put to death large number of Falun Gong prisoners of conscience since 1999.

The Ontario case is one of 54 legal proceedings in 33 countries, against Jiang and other officials. It asserts that the five defendants orchestrated the systematic and brutal persecution of the plaintiffs and hundreds of thousands of other Falun Gong practitioners in China.

Motion Hearing

TIME: 10 am, Friday July 14, 2006

LOCATION: 393 University Avenue ( 6th Floor for Zhang et al. v. Zemin et al.)

CONTACT: Kate Kempton, Olthuis Kleer Townshend, legal counsel, 416-571-6775

Statement by Kunlun Zhang, Canadian Falun Gong practitioner recently released from a Chnese prison

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Report into allegations of organ harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China


The summary below was highlighted by a reader and is not an official summary of the report. The full report can be found here while a shorther version of the official summary is available here. And the good news is: The Conservative Government Investigates Allegations of Chinese Organ Harvesting From Political Prisoners. Look here for Between Heaven and Earth's reaction and recommendations, here for more media coverage on this topic and here for a response to Communist China's Statement. Meanwhile you may listen to a great coverage by Australia ABC Michael Edwards who comments on organ harvesting in Communist China: MP3 (Report alleges Chinese Govt harvesting body organs of political prisoners).


REPORT INTO ALLEGATIONS OF ORGAN HARVESTING OF FALUN GONG PRACTITIONERS IN CHINA

6 July 2006

SUMMARY DOCUMENT

Authors: David Kilgour former Canadian Secretary of State for Asia Pacific

David Matas, Canadian immigration, refugee and international human rights lawyer

CONCLUSIONS:

We believe that there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners.

We have concluded that the government of China and its agencies in numerous parts of the country, in particular hospitals but also detention centres and 'people's courts', since 1999 have put to death a large but unknown number of Falun Gong prisoners of conscience. Their vital organs, including hearts, kidneys, livers and corneas, were virtually simultaneously seized involuntarily for sale at high prices, sometimes to foreigners, who normally face long waits for voluntary donations of such organs in their home countries.

It appears to us that many human beings belonging to a peaceful voluntary organization made illegal seven years ago by President Jiang because he thought it might threaten the dominance of the Communist Party of China have been in effect executed by medical practitioners for their organs.

Our conclusion comes not from any one single item of evidence, but rather the piecing together of all the evidence we have considered. Each portion of the evidence we have considered is, in itself, verifiable and, in most cases, incontestable. Put together, they paint a damning whole picture. It is their combination that has convinced us.

MAJOR POINTS OF EVIDENCE INCLUDE:

Conducive Climate for the Crimes

Pattern of human rights violations: Rule of Law to prevent human rights violations is glaringly absent in China. According to its constitution, China is ruled by the Communist Party. It is not ruled by law.

Corruption: Trafficking in Falun Gong organs would be consistent with widespread corruption in the country and notably with the other commercial activities of the Chinese army.

Lack of legislation: On July 1, a new law went into effect; it bans the sale of organs and requires donors to indicate their willingness in writing. Despite the law, it is known that there is a large gap between legislation and implementation in China.

Documentation of the Persecution of Falun Gong

Perceived threat: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in particular president Jiang Zemin, came to see Falun Gong as a threat to its monopoly of ideological power over China in the late 1990s; by 1999, the CCP estimated that there were 70 million Falun Gong practitioners. However, the movement is not political and it followers seek to promote truth, tolerance and compassion across racial, national and cultural boundaries; violence is considered abhorrent.

Policy of persecution: We know that persecution of Falun Gong exists as an official policy from policy statements issued directly by the CCP.

Incitement to hatred: The CCP adopted 3 strategies to crush Falun Gong: violence against anyone who refuse to renounce their beliefs; "brainwashing" to force all known practitioners to abandon Falun Gong and renounce it; a media campaign to turn public opinion against Falun Gong.

Massive arrests: Classified information reveals that by the end of April 2001, less than two years into the ban, there had been approximately 830,000 arrests of Falun Gong adherents.

Repression: The crackdown included Jiang's creation of a special force, the 6-10 office in every province, city, county, university, government department and government-owned business to spearhead the attack. Jiang's mandate to the office was to "eradicate" Falun Gong.

Factors that Point Specifically to Organ Harvesting

Confession: One witness said her surgeon husband told her that he personally removed the corneas from approximately 2,000 Falun Gong prisoners in 2 years and that none of the cornea "donors" survived because their other vital organs were also taken, and their bodies cremated.

Admissions of using Falun Gong organs: Investigators analysed numerous recorded telephone calls with detention centres, hospitals and courts across China. Several officials openly admitted to using organs from Falun Gong practitioners.

Short waiting times: Hospital websites in China advertise short waiting times for organ transplants – 1 to 2 weeks versus years elsewhere – or that they have living “donors” available almost on demand. A large bank of living "donors" is the only way such short wait times can be assured. Some websites have now removed this information.

Many more transplants than identifiable sources: The sources of 41,500 transplants for the period 2000-2005 are unexplained. Before 1999, China had 22 liver transplant centres, compared to 500 in mid-April, 2006, for example. The increase in organ transplants parallels the increase in persecution of Falun Gong.

Unidentified / disappeared practitioners: Falun Gong practitioners, coming from around the country to Beijing to appeal or protest, are arrested. To protect their families and people at home, many don’t identify themselves. This large Falun Gong prison population whose identities and whereabouts are unknown would seem a likely source of harvested organs.

Blood testing of practitioners in detention are systematic. It is unlikely that this is for health reasons, while blood testing is a pre-requisite for organ transplants.

Corpses with missing organs have been returned to families with no coherent explanation.

Interviews with victims of the repression now living in Canada revealed a pattern of activities by authorities – such as inexplicable organ examinations – consistent with the allegations.

Huge profitability of organ transplant industry in China. One hospital website, for example, lists the cost of a liver as being up to US$130,000 and a heart US$160,000.

SOME KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. As organ harvesting from living, unwilling people, is a crime against humanity. It should stop immediately, and authorities in China should conduct a criminal investigation for possible prosecution.

2. Organizations-intergovernmental, governmental and voluntary-should take the allegations seriously and make their own determinations on whether or not they are true.

3. As the UN Protocol to prevent trafficking in persons bans the removal of organs, the UN should investigate whether China is in violation.

4. Foreign governments should ban the entry of Chinese doctors seeking training in organ transplantation and any doctor there known to be engaged in such work should be barred from visiting foreign countries permanently.

5. All countries should tighten their laws against organ trafficking and doctors should, for example, be required to report to their respective authorities any evidence that a patient has received an organ from a trafficked person abroad.

6. Governments should deny or revoke the passports of nationals who are travelling to China for organ transplants.

7. No governments should participate in any China-sponsored meeting or research on organ transplant. No private company should provide goods or services to any Chinese transplant program.

Saturday, July 08, 2006

Police witness tells of organ harvesting deals in Communist China

This is another account revealing shocking truths about the macabre organ harvesting conspiracy widespread in Communist China. Look here and here for related articles.

But first take a look at Congressman Dana Rohrabacher's reaction to live organ harvesting:

"This is gruesome and clearly beyond the moral standards of almost every country that I know. It's time for the civilized world to say "no" to the monsters that are tearing apart people in China and enriching themselves from others' bodies. We, as legislators, as statesmen and Americans, must not also become complicit in these crimes by keeping silent. History cares not whether we have inked another trade deal or helped sell another Boeing 747, but history will judge us if we choose to look the other way when faced with truly indescribable human suffering on this scale." (full report)

Police Witness Tells of Organ Harvesting Deals


Epoch Times: Jul 08, 2006 - As the name of "Sujiatun" surfaces, so do the inside stories of extremely brutal persecution against Falun Gong practitioners, criminals sentenced to death, and those who were driven to the outskirts of society by the Chinese communist regime.

During an interview with New Tang Dynasty TV, a former policeman from Guangzhou Province disclosed this inside story on how the Chinese communist regime utilizes its five operating divisions to coordinate with the police system. With a quota set for killing and organ harvesting, all the relevant activities receive permission to operate and no one dares to complain. This policeman said, "In the system operated by the Communist Party, if I kill, I can make money; the government allocates the funds. If I don't work, then I can't make a living. If I don't kill, how can I make a living?"

This policeman is Zhang Jianhua. Zhang was born June 30, 1959, and worked at Longgang Police Station of Shenzhen Public Security Bureau in Guangzhou Province.

Anchor: When were you a policeman in Shenzhen City?

Zhang: I was in the military before 1981. After being transferred to civilian work, I was again transferred to the Longgong Police Station in 1987. Since then, I was a policeman as well as a superintendent. I was mainly responsible for smuggling control and intelligence security, so I have good knowledge of internal documents issued by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). I am also very familiar with Falun Gong cases. In other words, I know the dark side of the Chinese communist regime very well, including murder and corruption cases. I came to America because I was too honest and could not comprehend the lies of being a policeman in mainland China. We were trained to have a good comprehension of law, so I could not remain silent while seeing the law being violated, though I did not report it. My conscience felt unsettled when I saw how victims, including Falun Gong practitioners, were being persecuted. Therefore, I reported those policemen's crimes to their supervisors. I could no longer simply watch unjust murder cases and Falun Gong cases happen, so I disclosed them. Imperceptibly, I received retaliation. There were many reasons for retaliation and forging evidence is very easy. It is also very easy to press charges against anyone who sympathizes with Falun Gong, and those CCP members and policemen are skilled in pressing charges, making it impossible to prove innocence – only guilt. I went to many places to appeal in China, including the National People's Congress, State Council and Ministry of Public Security. I appealed for the persecution against me. No one took my appeal seriously. Instead, they sent me away and mocked me, telling me to not get involved in so many affairs and to go back and be obedient.

I also personally went to the office of Shenzhen People's Daily, Nanfang Daily, and Nanfang Weekend to expose the inside stories. I even wrote to China Central Television (CCTV) editors and personally went to the CCTV station to talk to the persons in charge. They showed no interest at all since I wanted to reveal the dark side of the CCP; reporting such stories would only bring trouble upon themselves. They would never offend the public security system as a whole or tarnish the reputation of the government just to help me out of my troubles. Seeking action, the authorities of Longgang Police Station tried to find ways to fire me. I had no other choice but to flee the country and come to the United States.

The main mission since escaping from China is to expose the organ harvest and trade, along with the murdering and persecution of Falun Gong in China with the help of media outlets in the United States.

Anchor: You mentioned that you have witnessed the organ harvesting from a criminal. Could you please describe in detail the location, time and specific incident you witnessed?

Zhang: It was in 1998 when I was a criminal policeman at Longgang Police Station. Between 1997 and 1998, there was a major drug trafficking case, the biggest of its kind in entire Asia, which was called "961 drug trafficking case," or "916 drug trafficking case", if I remember correctly. The major criminal's name was Wang Tiansong. He had an accomplice whose name was Chen Longzai (They were both arrested). I personally knew Chen Longzai because he lived in our district and had gathered information for me before. However, he met his due punishment for smuggling and trafficking drugs, and was executed in 1997. I followed Chen's case closely because I was friends with one of his relatives. Chen and his brother were both from Hong Kong, and his brother wished to see him one more time before the execution. I knew that all his internal organs were missing and they must have been harvested. The brother's main concern was precisely that Chen Longzai's organs might be removed, because it is thought to be inauspicious if one's organs are taken out upon death.

Anchor: Did people know Chen's organs would be harvested that day because similar incidents had occurred before?

Zhang: His brother definitely knew that Chen Longzai's organs were to be harvested. Nowhere in China can you appeal against organ harvesting from criminals sentenced to death. There is absolutely no way to acquire the body after execution. That day, several of Chen Longzai's friends were also executed. There were about six people in his group.

The whole process was conducted in secret. This execution site was designed in such a way that the road was relatively flat, and it also took approximately 2 hours to get to the crematorium. Armed police were assigned to conduct the organ harvesting. Allowing these policemen to conduct the secret operation did not represent a breach to security because the armed police belong to the army, which has a secure system. Therefore, the Central Military Commission of the CCP must have issued a document stating that criminals sentenced to death can no longer be treated as human beings. The average person presumably understands that such criminals committed atrocities and therefore cannot be treated as human beings. The government allocated funds for organ harvesting. They purchased or imported some advanced and specialized vehicle that can be used for organ extraction on the road.

Anchor: Was the operation conducted inside the van?

Zhang: It was conducted inside the van. After the criminals were executed, they were transported into the van. Because the armed police also conducted the entire execution process, the average person does not know what they do inside the van—only the traffic police, criminal police, or armed police know the secret operations.

I went to the execution site to watch the execution. In general, the bullet would hit a crucial spot. This was chosen so as not to cause severe bleeding. Because I was a policeman, normally they didn't care that I was there observing. At that time I had an interest in seeing how they operated. I was curious to why that many imported vans had lowered curtains and shut doors. In this profession, there are many foreign doctors, many MDs. The armed police recruited a large number of medical doctors with bachelor's degrees and doctor's degrees to engage in organ harvesting and related research. These people are extremely talented. But once they got into it, they didn't want to be involved any longer, and many wanted to leave and go abroad. They, however, could not leave because they knew the secrets of the operation. All of them had a deep sense of guilt and regretted getting involved in the organ transplant research.

At the execution site, the whole process went very fast. Once the criminal was executed, the body would be moved into the van and those wearing police hats and white lab coats climbed into the vehicle, shutting the door behind them. Each vehicle can only accommodate one body. On that day, a total of six vans were on site, among which two were borrowed from private hospitals because there were not enough vehicles. All the drivers were armed police or the doctors.

During the transportation, the vehicle drove slowly but steadily, which was probably to facilitate the operation. The vehicles from armed police and traffic police escorted the vans the whole time to prohibit anyone from getting close. All civilian vehicles had to pull to the side of the road. These operations seemed more secure than escorting a nation's president.

We followed them all the way to the crematorium. My Hong Kong friend's brother insisted on seeing his brother Chen Longzai one last time. I lent him a uniform and told him, "If you wear plain clothes, you won't be able to see your brother. Only if you wear a uniform, will you be able to see your brother." Once we arrived at the crematorium, the whole place was shut down and surrounded by the armed police. No one was allowed to enter. Even many people working at the crematorium could not get close. Only the person operating the furnace could.

Because he wanted to see his brother one last time and was even willing to risk his life, I took a risk because it was my commitment to his father. So I told the guard that we were police from the Longgang station. I claimed that six people in the vans were prisoners from our station, and we still have to fill some loopholes in the criminal cases by taking a picture of the face and putting it on record.

The armed guard said, "It is okay for you to look, but don't get too close. Rules from above mandate that nobody should get closer than 2 meters." So we stood two meters away from the body. We saw them unzip the bag. I saw that the transparent bag was full of blood and the whole body was soaked in blood. I thought, perhaps an operation had occurred.

When the bag was unzipped, the face could be seen. Right away, my friend was so agitated that he rushed on; as soon as he unzipped the bag, blood poured out. We could see that the body was empty and all the organs were gone. The eyes were gone as well—perhaps corneas were needed. He wanted to shout and I asked him not to, as it would put his life in danger. Later I apologized to the guard and told him that my friend got too scared upon seeing the body and the blood. The guard recorded our names.

After recording our names, we found their leader and explained the situation. Later the leader asked about my friend. I told him that my friend was related to the person who was shot. He just wanted to see him one last time. He was a security guy, not an armed police. I gave him the police suit to wear. I told them he was a security policeman and I begged for forgiveness.

Maybe they didn't know we had another purpose and thought we only wanted to see the body. That person in charge didn't seem to mind. He let us know that there are rules from above and that we could not share this information with anyone. Later my friend wanted to expose this through Hong Kong media. I told him not to do it because it would harm me. It happens everywhere in China. As a result, he didn't go to Hong Kong media.

Why do I want to bring this out today? It is because organ harvesting in China has reached an excessive and unbelievable state. The government is out of control. It doesn't care about people's lives and deaths including those of Falun Gong. It only cares about money and research. Organs that can be used are all used. Nobody, besides outsiders, dares to expose them, and only foreign media dare to criticize it. Media in China doesn't dare, and would not expose it even if they witnessed it.

Organ harvesting has become an unmentioned part of the milieu. Every hospital is finding organs. Courts are finding police to find targets to get benefits. Through the Department of Finance, the Department of Public Health is giving funds to hospitals. Every year the Chinese communist regime carries on the "strike-hard" campaign in October and November. Some people are killed during the campaign. Then a lot of organs will be available. So every year around that time, the Department of Public Health gives funds to several large hospitals. As a result, operations and surgeries are abundant during this period of time.

After the criminals are killed, their organs are immediately removed. The technology is very advanced and a lot of money is invested there. Many instruments come from foreign institutions specialized in this type equipment; these institutions loan money to you and give you any equipment you want, generating a substantial circulation of money. Our Public Security Bureau also benefits financially from the process. Our district Party secretary Liu Zhigeng said, on killing people, "When you execute one criminal, our Longgang District will award your Bureau 30,000 yuan."

Why would we refuse this money? As a result of this process, our Public Security Bureau is very enthusiastic about severely punishing criminals. But we do not know whether the person killed is a good person or a bad person. As for whether the television station chooses to broadcast the good or the bad case, it is up to them. So, in many cases, those in need of organs have to coordinate with our Public Security Bureau. You let us know what kind of organs you need, and if you need a large number, we simply kill more people.

Anchor: Roughly how many people are executed in a year?

Zhang: The National Ministry of Public Security gives us quotas. For example, for the Public Security Bureau in Shenzhen city, if they are strict in punishing crimes, the quota is between ten and twenty — the more the better; usually, it would not be less than ten. The city has a high crime rate, and the quota is given based on the crime rate. It seems that in Hunan province and Xinjiang region the crime rate is low; when crime rate is low, [the killing quota] is low as well. The Public Security Bureau in Shenzhen is under much pressure because it has difficulty fulfilling the annual killing quota allocated to them. So, they try their best to establish informants and find clues. If you are a businessman, you'd better not offend anyone.

In the end, the job of the police is to kill people, while the job of the crematorium is to cooperate with the police. Since it is sanctioned by top ranks, all kinds of people are involved in this business, including the leaders from the Department of Civil Affairs, Department of Finance, Department of Public Health, Public Security Bureau, the court, and the Department of Supervision. It involved leaders from several units and always receives permission to proceed. Whatever and however you did it, nobody would say anything. So the Communist Party's operation is very smooth, and [people are] very obedient. Why wouldn't they be? If I killed a person, I can receive a bonus of 30,000 yuan awarded by the government; if I do nothing I cannot keep my job. How can I keep my job if I do not kill people?

If you do not provide the organs to the Department of Public Health, how can the Department of Finance give you money? People dare to do this because the central government leaders have provided confirmation. There are several benefits. First of all, one can gain fame by studying human organs, and can be reported by newspapers worldwide. Not surprisingly, China's organ research ranks amongs the top internationally, so those in need of organs have come to China from all over the world. In recent years it is reported that China's organ research is very advanced; that is because they have more organs. If they fail, they will study the operation again; fail again, and study again. Their study can move ahead because China has so many organs for them to study. Other countries cannot do this: If you cannot study and transplant one organ well, I will sue you. In China, where can you sue? You cannot, since each separate department has its own insurance system. You can techinically sue; go to Beijing to sue, but you may have your own organs removed! How can you sue?

Where do you sue? Isn't that the ultimate question, the dilemma itself? All is under the Chinese Communist Party.

Friday, July 07, 2006

Organ Harvesting: Kilgour-Matas' response to Communist China Statement

UPDATE: Listen to a great coverage by Australia ABC Michael Edwards who comments on the report MP3 (Report alleges Chinese Govt harvesting body organs of political prisoners).

MEDIA ADVISORY

The Government of China released a statement in response to our report titled 'Report into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China' dated July 6, 2006. The statement can be found here. We have these reactions to this statement:

1. The statement of the Government of China was released the same day as our Report. The statement of the Government of China dismisses our Report out of hand. We view this reaction is unconsidered. It means that the Government of China has engaged in no investigations to determine whether or not what the report contains is true.

2. The statement of the Government of China begins with the phrase--"In order to extricate itself from an awkward position after its lie about "Sujiatun Concentration Camp" has been laid bare, Falun Gong has shifted..."

This phrase is incorrect in a number of different ways. First, it suggests that our Report is a Falun Gong report. Yet, it is not. We are not Falun Gong practitioners. We did this report as volunteers and were not paid for this report by Falun Gong or anyone. Our report represents our own judgment. We have not acted on the instructions of Falun Gong or anyone else in coming to the conclusions we did.

3. The assertions about Sujiatun Concentration Camp to which the Chinese statement refers originated from the ex-wife of a surgeon at Sujiatun Hospital. This person is not a Falun Gong practitioner. This person has not changed or shifted her story at any time. David Kilgour interviewed her. An excerpt of the interview can be found at Appendix 13 of our report.

4. It is our own opinion, expressed in our report, that this woman was not lying. We concluded that she was credible.

5. In our report we did not rely on this witness alone to come to our conclusions. In our report, this is what we said about the testimony of this witness:

"The testimony of the wife of the surgeon allegedly complicit in Falun Gong organ harvesting seemed credible to us, partly because of its extreme detail. However, that detail also posed a problem for us, because it provided a good deal of information which it was impossible to corroborate independently. We were reluctant to base our findings on sole source information. So, in the end, we relied on the testimony of this witness only where it was corroborative and consistent with other evidence, rather than as sole source information."

Our report is not a shift from what this witness says, but rather an expansion, with a larger focus than just Sujiatun Hospital.

6. The Chinese statement then says:

"It is obvious that their purpose is to smear China's image." We reply that we have no wish to smear China's image. Our sole concerns are respect for the truth and human rights.

7. The Chinese statement then says:

"China has consistently abided by the relevant guiding principles of the World Health Organization endorsed in 1991, prohibiting the sale of human organs and stipulating that donors' written consent must be obtained beforehand and donors are entitled to refuse the donation at last minute."

This statement that China made is denied by the facts. The China International Transplantation Network Assistance Centre Website until April of this year set out a price list for transplants. The price list was removed from the website in April, but is still archived. To see the web site now, go here. To see the archived site, go here. As well, many individuals can attest to paying for organ transplants in China.

8. The statement that China has consistently abided by the principle stipulating that donors' written consent must be obtained beforehand is also belied by the facts. Human Rights Watch has reported that consent is obtained from executed prisoners in only a minority of cases. The organization writes that even in this minority of cases "the abusive circumstances of detention and incarceration in China, from the time a person is first accused of a capital offense until the moment of his or her execution, are such as to render absurd any notion of "free and voluntary consent."

*Organ Procurement and Judicial Execution in China*, August 1994

9. The China statement goes on to say:

"China has issued a regulation on human organ transplants, explicitly banning the sale of organs and introducing a set of medical standards for organ transplants in an effort to guarantee medical safety and the health of patients. The regulation requires medical institution which is qualified for practising human organ transplant to register at provincial level health department. Unregistered medical institutions are forbidden to practice human organ transplant. If the government finds any registered institution violating the regulation, it will cancel the registration and punish the people responsible."

We acknowledge that this is so, and wrote about it in our Report. We also noted that this legislation came into force only a few days ago on July 1st. It is not an answer to our findings about what happened before that date. Moreover, in China, there is a huge gap between enacting legislation and enforcing it.

10. The Government of China then writes:

"It is very clear that Falun Gong's rumour has ulterior political motives."

None of our findings are based on rumour. Every finding we make is sourced and independently verifiable.

11. The China statement then says:

"Therefore, the so called "independent investigation report" made by a few Canadians based on rumours and false allegations is groundless and biased. We do believe that lies are always lame, and will never become the truth even if being repeated 1000 times. We hope that the Canadian people will not be deceived by the disguise of the Falun Gong, and more people will be aware of the nature of "Falun Gong" as an evil cult."

This conclusion is an attack both on us and Falun Gong. The Report has to be judged on its merits. Attacking its authors is not an appropriate response.

Secondly calling the Falun Gong an evil cult exemplifies the vilification heaped on the Falun Gong. It is this sort of slander which, in China, depersonalizes and dehumanizes the Falun Gong and makes possible the violation of their basic human rights.

Calling a group of innocent civilians an "evil cult" is a form of incitement to hatred, unacceptable in Canada. It is an abuse of their diplomatic presence in China for China to engage in this form of incitement.

For more information, please contact:

David Kilgour: (613) 747-7854 David Matas: (204) 944-1831

Thursday, July 06, 2006

2008 Beijing Olympics--why bother?


In light of the latest Canadian report revealing China’s involvement in illegal mass-scale organ harvesting from the Falun Gong (watch video here), my question is: Does Communist China still deserve to host the 2008 Olympics? --Matas called the practice a shocking new form of evil on this planet (CBC and Epoch Times). Listen to a great coverage by Australia ABC Michael Edwards who comments on the report MP3 (Report alleges Chinese Govt harvesting body organs of political prisoners). Highlights of the report can be found here.


Take a look at some of the comments collected so far and go here for more on this issue. Scroll down to the end to sign the China Support Network (CSN) petition and look here for their insightful viewpoints.


But first, here’s the buzz from the Falun Gong:

Clearwisdom editors sound the alarm by stressing that Beijing's current persecution of Falun Gong violates the spirit of humanity, peace, and human dignity that the Olympic Games promotes. (Reuters/FDI) "We hope that China will not see winning the Olympics as a license to kill," Falun Gong spokesman Erping Zhang... "History has shown us that the Jiang Zemin regime has taken advantage of every major international event to silence all dissenting voices, and Falun Gong practitioners will most likely continue to bear the brunt of such political campaigns," the statement said.

But, warning signs have surfaced in recent months that the persecution is getting worse by the minute and with new laws to stifle freedom of the press—tension is very high among human rights activists and dissidents.

Last June (2005) CCP authorities reportedly held a “crisis meeting” in which China’s deputy minister of Public Security, Liu Jing, was assigned the job of “stamping out” Falun Gong “before the Olympic Games in 2008,” according to the Paris-based Intelligence Online. Several reports have stated that authorities wish to use the Olympics as a pretext to deepen their assault on the Falun Gong.

This past January Chinese officials similarly announced a “new campaign” that would supposedly “sabotage activities of cult organizations” as part of a “complex struggle against enemies,” according to a Reuters report. Past campaigns to “strike hard” have resulted in upwards of 10,000-plus executions in a single year, say human rights groups.

Word of concentration camps for Falun Gong practitioners has circulated for several years. An October 1, 2000, report by Agence France Presse told of two concentration camps having been recently built, both specifically for Falun Gong detainees. The camps were said to have been built in northwest and northeast China, and been capable of each holding up to 50,000 persons.

The Falun Gong are certainly not the only ones that are persecuted in China these days. Christians, Muslims, Tibetans, liberal scholars, human rights lawyers and activists, bloggers, journalists and dissidents all have morbid stories to tell about their mistreatment at the hands of the CCP. All of this put together has the same flavour as the Cultural Revolution.


EU Vice-President Edward McMillan-Scott and member of the Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (CIPFG) has a lot to say about this:

(Epoch Times) McMillan-Scott said he was in a state of shock after his meetings in Beijing with people, ‘whose relations are in detention in China, and who are Falun Gong practitioners, who are beaten and tortured”. Once the world know what has been going on, I cannot see how the Olympics can take place in China and that China can change fundamentally by 2008,”he told Gao (Zhisheng). McMillan-Scott explained, “The reports of organ harvesting of (the Falun Gong) prisoners, that is to day, the reverse matching of organs and tissues, which in my view amounts to genocide.”

(Clearwisdom) Mr. McMillan-Scott has demanded an urgent meeting with the Chinese ambassador to the EU saying "According to the many diplomats, journalists and other observers I met, it is not just Falun Gong, but other Buddhists - especially Tibetans - Christians and Muslims who are being persecuted. "If people in Beijing think this is the way to prepare for the Olympics they have made the wrong call."

(Epoch Times) McMillan hopes that human rights organizations around the world can unite to focus on China in advance of the 2008 Beijing Olympics. He said, "It (CCP) is after all the biggest and most repressive regime left on earth."

(ClearHarmony) Mr. McMillan-Scott concluded his speech by saying that the CCP should follow the international covenants it signed, as the 2008 Olympics are approaching. Once the reports are issued, especially those about persecuting Falun Gong, and the organ removal from living practitioners, and tortures being confirmed by investigators, they will affect the decision of the international society on whether the Olympics should be allowed to be hosted by China.

For the latest reports on organ harvesting labour camps look here.

Epoch Times: Congressman Dana Rohrabacher: This is gruesome and clearly beyond the moral standards of almost every country that I know. It's time for the civilized world to say "no" to the monsters that are tearing apart people in China and enriching themselves from others' bodies. We, as legislators, as statesmen and Americans, must not also become complicit in these crimes by keeping silent. History cares not whether we have inked another trade deal or helped sell another Boeing 747, but history will judge us if we choose to look the other way when faced with truly indescribable human suffering on this scale.

SMC: The Party is not over until we say Briefing the visiting International Olympic Committee last month on preparations for the 2008 Games here, the Beijing party chief, Liu Qi, said the Games would reflect a "harmonious society", code words for the dissentless orthodoxy that Hu, who is also Chinese President, is making the hallmark of his leadership. We can expect Chinese protesters to be swept out of sight.

***Pay attention to this***

THE MOVEMENT TO BOYCOTT THE BERLIN OLYMPICS OF 1936

For two weeks in August 1936, Adolf Hitler's Nazi dictatorship camouflaged its racist, militaristic character while hosting the Summer Olympics. Softpedaling its antisemitic agenda and plans for territorial expansion, the regime exploited the Games to bedazzle many foreign spectators and journalists with an image of a peaceful, tolerant Germany. Having rejected a proposed boycott of the 1936 Olympics, the United States and other western democracies missed the opportunity to take a stand that--some observers at the time claimed--might have given Hitler pause and bolstered international resistance to Nazi tyranny. With the conclusion of the Games, Germany's expansionist policies and the persecution of Jews and other "enemies of the state" accelerated, culminating in World War II and the Holocaust.

Epoch Times: The Timetable of the Entire Fascist Strategy: Professor Yuan stated that the CCP’s entire Fascist strategy would proceed through the following stages:

1. Before the 2008 Olympic Games

During this period of time, the CCP primarily proposes to instigate and propel nationalism. At the same time, it will try hard to ensure a relatively stable social climate and maintain the present state so that it can push fanatical nationalism to a climax using the competitive environment of the Olympic Games.

2. For Two Years After the 2008 Olympic Games

The CCP will eliminate opposing voices inside its system. The CCP will solve its political crisis through severe political pressure. It will comprehensively oppress opposing groups, defined by the CCP as Falun Gong, political dissidents, and underground Christians.

Epoch Times: T Kumar, Amnesty International USA Advocacy Director for Asia and the Pacific, noted that "in spite of promises to improve human rights, China continues to account for upwards of 80% of all executions in the world," and on a large scale uses their organs for sale. "At this rate, the only world record China is guaranteed to earn at the 2008 games will be for the world's champion of executions," said T. Kumar, Amnesty International USA Advocacy Director for Asia and the Pacific

DJ McGuire and China e-Lobby:

First among them (engagement theories) is the notion that the 2008 Olympics will make Communist China a better-behaved power in the world. The plan makes clear the Olympics have one purpose: “to further arouse Chinese people’s patriotism and prepare for attacking Taiwan.” Clearly, any nation who participates in the 2008 Games will repeat the same mistakes as the participants of the 1936 Berlin Games—they will hand a criminal, despotic regime a propaganda gold mine to justify unleashing the dogs of war. Any nation planning to send athletes to Beijing in 2008 should, if they love liberty, announce immediately that, painful as it may be, their athletes will stay home. Sign the petition here.

Congressman Chris Smith:

“We say to Beijing, if you want to be part of the civilized world and join the nations in that world community and be partners with the world, stop repressing, stop torturing, and let the Falun Gong live in peace.” Congressman Chris Smith, NJ

Eric Walton, Foreign Affairs Critc for the Canadian Green Party: “My feeling is that this is so serious that it would require all levels of Canadian response. By that I mean diplomatic, but also commercial and even—I know this would upset some people—but I think we would even call into question Canada’s participation in the Olympic Games".

It costs money to change human rights violations by Chriz Miller, Calgary Herald

Unfortunate for the thousands of political prisoners suffering under the autocratic rule of the communist regime, it's doubtful China will make more than symbolic changes in its undemocratic repression and human rights abuses.

That should be alarming--China is fast becoming a global superpower, with a economy growing so quickly that half of the world's construction cranes are on its soil. It also has the dubious reputation of being home to 16 of the world's top 20 most polluted cities, according to the World Bank. Far from creating a Taiwanese democracy, China still locks up political objectors in asylums for speaking out against the state. Is this the kind of superpower we want to be bargaining with?

There is a chance for the western world have an affect on the Asian power while the dragon is still growing. Hu has been talking about creating a harmonious world. The country is becoming engaged in international diplomacy and international trade in a way it has never done before in its millenniums-old history.

Hu says China won't take lessons from U.S. on human rights

China will make its own decisions on political freedom and human rights and not copy the model of western countries, Chinese President Hu Jintao said Friday as he wound up his U.S. tour. But when asked whether his country's restrictions on political expression would cause unrest and hinder its economic growth, he said China is committed to democracy but has no plans to import other countries' policies.

"On one hand, we are ready and willing to draw on the useful experience of foreign countries into political involvement,'' he said.

"On the other hand, we will not simply copy the political models of other countries.''

A statement from Religious Deterioration is Reason to Reject China's Olympic Bid, States Freedom House

"Memories of the Olympics in Nazi Berlin continue to cast a shadow over the Games. The Olympics would again be dishonored by the scandal of holding the prestigious events in a country where "unapproved" houses of worship are routinely bulldozed, grandmothers and priests are bludgeoned to death for religious practices, and religious people are sent to labor camp by the tens of thousands," said Center director Nina Shea, referring to the destruction of thousands of churches, temples and shrines in Wenzhou in the weeks before Christmas and the fact that mass numbers of religious believers, especially Falun Gong practitioners, are being arrested and persecuted.

John Derbyshire's predictions came true:

“Following I.O.C. approval of Beijing’s bid, the following thing will happen daily in camps and prisons all over China and the territories China has occupied: Starved, ragged prisoners will be beaten by guards who, as they swing the clubs, will jeer: “See how much the world cares about you? They don’t give a damn! They’ve awarded us the Olympics! We can do as we please with you — nothing will happen to us! The world loves us, and you are ON YOUR OWN!”

Sir Paul McCartney has vowed never to perform in China after seeing horrific undercover footage of dogs and cats being killed for their fur. The former Beatle also said he would boycott the 2008 Beijing Olympics after viewing the footage taken in a fur market in Guangzhou, southern China.

Does Beijing play by the rules? Robert Fulford explains:

Any Olympic bid naturally involves a contradiction: it combines implausible braggadocio with humiliating genuflection. The city that wants to become the site of the Olympics must boast and beg at the same time. It must claim to be a metropolis of the highest class while simultaneously abasing itself to seduce a committee of suspicious strangers -- in this case a committee whose recent history is itself gravely stained by scandal.

Here is one example of the cadres’corruption. Sacked Olympics chief had 'pleasure palace' full of concubines.

It’s time to resurrect one of my favourite pieces on the Communist Olympics with a special twist a la Fulford --

Imagine a campaign for world democracy by Robert Fulford

The National Post, 13 December 2003 - The government in Beijing wants the 2008 Olympics to do for China what the 1964 Olympics did for Japan: Display the country's best qualities and prove that it deserves a place in the family of nations. This means that the Olympics offer a once-in-a-century opportunity to anyone hoping to nudge China toward freedom. Assuming that Chinese human rights remain at their present level, international activists could make the Olympics an occasion to reveal all the grim details. Or perhaps, by simply making a credible threat to humiliate China in 2008, they could encourage long-term improvements.

Members of Falun Gong are the most famous among the several classes of officially persecuted Chinese. The government has made their spiritual practice illegal, on the dubious grounds that they constitute a dangerous, superstition-spreading cult that jeopardizes social stability. Translated, this means Chinese leaders can't live with an organization, however innocent, that's beyond political control. Falun Gong members have been beaten, tortured, sent to work camps, and imprisoned in mental hospitals. All over the world they stand silently outside Chinese consulates and embassies, living symbols of opposition to a regime that smugly believes it can get away forever with arbitrary cruelty. In their vigils the Falun Gong beg, peacefully, for help from the part of humanity that's free.

They deserve support. Why shouldn't the athletes of the world, who will probably contribute to China's prestige in 2008, adopt the Falun Gong as their personal cause? They could begin by indicating sympathy through frequent visits to Falun Gong vigils. They could write letters of support to members imprisoned in China, request talks on the Falun Gong with every Chinese diplomat in the world, and raise the subject whenever meeting Chinese officials for any reason.

They could announce that if China doesn't change its ways, they'll march into the Beijing Olympic Stadium on opening day in 2008, congregate on the field, and perform slow-movement meditation in the style of Falun Gong while several billion TV viewers look on. (They could start practising it at athletic meets right now, as a sign of solidarity.) To do all this they wouldn't need permission from their governments, just silent assent.

That's not one of Mark Palmer's plans, but it's the sort of thing that danced through my mind as I read his remarkable how-to book on the expansion of democracy, a brisk and concise work that's unfortunately lumbered with a clumsy title, Breaking the Real Axis of Evil: How to Oust the World's Last Dictators by 2025 (Rowman & Littlefield). Palmer spent 26 years in the U.S. State Department, four as ambassador to Hungary. Since 1990 he's been running broadcasting systems in the former Soviet empire while campaigning for democracy. His book proposes that the free peoples of the world commit themselves to abolishing dictatorship in the next 22 years.

Tyranny has been slowly disappearing for decades, but there remain 45 dictatorships in the world, from Than Shwe in Burma to the princes of Saudi Arabia. While making the lives of their people wretched, they remain capable of starting many more bloody wars before they finally disappear.

How to unseat them? First, Palmer argues, the democratic world must decide that it wants them gone and governments must publicly articulate this goal. Diplomats and business executives, accustomed to flattering tyrants, will object, but Palmer believes public opinion can wear down diplomatic and economic arguments. He wants dictatorship declared a crime against humanity, punishable like other such crimes.

World democracy, he argues, is a critical security goal for everyone, in matters of health and business as much as in questions of terrorism. A democratic China almost certainly would have handled SARS with some honesty and efficiency rather than the mendacity and incompetence it displayed, and Canada might well have been spared a tragedy.

Palmer thinks that military action against dictators will sometimes be necessary, but he favours non-violent struggles, like the one he watched (and abetted) in Hungary in the 1980s and the recent displacement of Eduard Shevardnadze in Georgia. He provides a tool-kit of ways to fight tyranny, with detailed instructions for 198 forms of non-violent action (23 kinds of strike, 25 forms of economic boycott). He imagines campaigns run by private citizens all over the world but acknowledges that governments will necessarily be involved. Why is there no democratic caucus at the UN? And why didn't the democracies boycott the UN Human Rights Commission when Libya was made chair? (There are many reasons, of course, all of them shameful.) How many foreign governments offered words of support for the highly unusual pro-democracy protest in Riyadh this October? Palmer considers it outrageous that his old State Department colleagues were silent.

He wants to make the transition to democracy a concern of the whole world, not a few politicians and a few organized civil libertarians. His views have a Utopian sound, but perhaps there are times when it's appropriate to re-introduce elements of Utopian thinking into the bloodstream of politics. Better than a moon landing, a campaign for world democracy could turn out to be the great project of the next two decades.


And the award for the best petition goes to:

China Support Network(CSN) Olympics Petition; go here

Wouldn't it be ironic for the Olympic torch to promote not international brotherhood, but a cruel totalitarian regime that tortures dissidents and bombards its population with nationalist propaganda? That's exactly what will take place in 2008 if the world community stands by and lets it happen. Tell the International Olympics Committee that this is not acceptable by signing our petition to move the Games to a free city.

Related Articles and links to this post: here and here

Intelligence Center for Olympics By Intelligence Online February 24, 2006

Enslaved Falun Dafa Practitioners Forced to Work on Preparations for 2008 Olympic Games

US State Department 2005 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Chinese Communist Regime Continues to Persecute Falun Gong

Olympic Watch

China's Human Rights Record and Falun Gong

fidh.org / Networking for Human Rights Defenders

Why we are boycotting Beijing 2008 ?

No Olympics in China Until Tibet is Free" - TYC led Indefinite Hunger Strike

Human Rights Watch

Monday, July 03, 2006

Canadian report confirms China's involvement in harvesting organs of Falun Gong

UPDATE: The report shows evidence of China's organ harvesting scheme targeted at Falun Gong; watch video here and take a look a the report here. Matas called the practice a shocking new form of evil on the planet. (CBC and Epoch Times). Listen to a great coverage by Australia ABC Michael Edwards who comments on the report: MP3 (Report alleges Chinese Govt harvesting body organs of political prisoners).

CTV.ca: by News Staff With a report from CTV's Roger Smith - Updated Mon. Jul. 3 2006 11:43 PM ET - A Canadian report, set for release Thursday, will support accusations that China is harvesting the vital organs of imprisoned Falun Gong dissidents, CTV News has learned.

Siding with critics of the Chinese government, former Liberal MP David Kilgour is now convinced that controversial allegations of organ harvesting are true.

"They take both kidneys, then the heart and the skin and the corneas and the liver, and your body is then thrown in the incinerator," Kilgour said.

Falun Gong, a quasi-religious movement that's outlawed in China, claims thousands of their imprisoned members have been murdered with their vital organs taken out to supply a booming trade in transplants.

Backed by MPs from all parties, Kilgour and human rights lawyer David Matas agreed to investigate the allegations in May.

"I don't think anyone can have any doubt that this unbelievable practice is continuing," Kilgour said of his findings.

As evidence, the former MP points to transcripts of phone calls to Chinese doctors, with Falun Gong supporters posing as rich foreigners looking for a transplant.

One transcript reads:

"Do you have Falun Gong organ suppliers?"

"We used to have, yes."

"What about now?"

"Yes."

Kilgour outlined how much the organs can fetch on the black market.

"$62,000 for a kidney, $98,000 to $130,000 for a liver," he said.

The Chinese deny the allegations, insisting that Kilgour has been duped by Falun Gong.

"These allegations are based on lies," Chinese diplomat Zhang Weidong said.

The UN and Amnesty International are also investigating but neither has come up with enough solid evidence to reach the same conclusion as Kilgour.

"Right now, it's insufficient (the evidence) for us to confirm or deny these allegations," said Amnesty International's Alain Roy.

At the launch of the investigation last May, Matas said the plan was to "interview personally whatever witnesses are available in North America," and to ask the Chinese government to grant Kilgour and him visas so that they could investigate in China.

It is unclear if they actually visited China as their initial request did not garner a response by the Chinese embassy.

Kilgour and Matas plan to hand their report to the government on Thursday along with recommendations for diplomatic pressure and sanctions on China.

Related Articles:

Organs harvested from Falun Gong prisoners, Kilgour says 'Wait to be butchered for highest bidder'

Vancouver World Peace Forum, Communist China, Organ Harvesting, and Falun Gong

Why Wang Wenyi was shouting

Canadian Team to Investigate Live Organ Harvesting in China

Gao Zhisheng Invites Investigators to Inspect Persecution of Falun Gong

Essential Information on Organ Harvesting from Falun Gong Practitioners in China

Letter of Vice president of EU, Edward McMillan-Scott

Going Public About Communist Concentration Camps

Sujiatun is merely one of 36 concentration camps for Falun Gong in China

Military Doctor Reveals Process of CCP's Organ Harvesting

Chinese lawyer Gao Zhisheng's open letter

Hong Kong pro-democracy groups emboldened

Nine years later, about 60,000 demonstrators took to the street demanding full democracy on July 1st. The success for Saturday's 'harmonious' march is partly due to the involvement of well-known democrat Anson Chan.

Taipei Times/AFP: (Hong Kong) July 03, 2006 - Emboldened by a strong turnout for their annual protest rally, Hong Kong's democracy campaigners yesterday sought to consolidate rejuvenated support for their struggle for universal suffrage.

One of their aims is to form an alliance with popular former deputy leader Anson Chan , whose presence at Saturday's street rally sparked a media blitz and is credited with boosting attendance.

Organizers estimated that 58,000 people braved soaring temperatures to join the annual rally calling for full democracy in the territory.

Although police put the figure much lower at 28,000, all estimates were higher than the estimated 20,000 marchers who attended last year's rally and exceeded most pundits' expectations.

"It shows that there is still enormous demand for universal suffrage," outspoken lawmaker Emily Lau said. "This was a good turnout."

Political watchers had been pessimistic about this year's rally, which marked the ninth anniversary of the day the former British colony was handed over to Chinese rule.

The pro-democracy camp once had huge support for its campaign to see the implementation of universal suffrage, as promised in the city's Basic Law constitution. Since Britain ceded control of Hong Kong in 1997, it has waged a bitter feud with government officials for the reform of an electoral system that sees leaders selected by a cabal of 800 China-backed elites.

The struggle has brought pro-democracy leaders in conflict with the ruling Chinese Communist Party, which is opposed to sudden reforms in China's richest city for fear it may destabilize the economy and spark calls for change in other parts of the country.

However, democrats have seen their support base dwindle in the past year as a booming economy and popular new China-backed Chief Exective Donald Tsang have swayed the agenda.

Democratic legislators' rejection of a government bill to introduce limited political reform last year also cast the movement as belligerent and an obstacle to economic development.

The decline in its fortunes was seen in falling attendances for the annual July 1 rally, which in 2003 and 2004 attracted more than half a million people.

The success of Saturday's demonstration has been partly accredited to Chan, who remains one of the city's most popular figures despite leaving government five years ago.

Chan emerged as a democrat last year when she joined a rally to gather support against the government's reform proposals, sparking suggestions she would challenge Tsang for the top spot.

So far she has acted without the backing of the mainstream pro-democracy movement, whose leaders have kept the former chief secretary at arm's length, fearing her celebrity would overwhelm their message.

However, such was the reception she received on Saturday that the heads of the democratic groups in the legislature have invited Chan to join them.

"We have asked her for a meeting to see what we could do together," said Lau, who was among several pro-democracy leaders Chan called yesterday to offer thanks for their support.

"She said she would consider it," Lau added.

Hong Kong government officials responded to Saturday's strong rally showing with a statement saying it took the calls for universal suffrage seriously and all options were open to discussion.

Echoing repeated calls by Chinese leaders not to upset social harmony in Hong Kong, Constitutional Affairs Secretary Stephen Lam yesterday urged all sides to set aside their differences and seek common ground.

Related Article:

Beijing pressures Hong Kong to outlaw Falun Gong

Taiwan: Democracy a slap in the face for the power mad

An insightful expose of Taiwan's cultural villainy by Chang Cheng-shuh, a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.

Taipei Times: Tuesday, Jun 27, 2006 - 1949, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Mainlanders who emigrated from China to Taiwan ruled over the Taiwanese majority. The party maintained power by uniting Mainlanders and isolating them from the Taiwanese who already lived here, separating them into an official class.

This segregation policy adopted by the KMT aimed to divide the Taiwanese people based on a good-bad dichotomy: Those who opposed the KMT were labeled villains, Taiwanese independence activists or even followers of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), while those who chose to cooperate with the KMT were treated as their servants.

The most important tools for implementing this segregation policy were the educational system and the media, which were used to teach the Taiwanese obedience and smear the images of those who opposed the KMT.

With the passage of time, and as a result of social changes, the Mainlanders living in Taiwan have become divided into two groups, "Taiwanese Main-landers" who identify with Taiwan, and "Chinese living in Taiwan" who do not identify with Taiwan. The longstanding policy to create an official class of Mainlanders produced a cultural and political phenomenon unique to the group of Chinese living in Taiwan.

Many people from this group believe they are the natural ruling class of Taiwan. They feel that they are wiser than the Taiwanese people, are an enlightened official class and are the teachers that should reform the Taiwanese people, who naturally should be obedient to their rule.

When former president Chiang Ching-kuo passed away, this group of Chinese living in Taiwan lost their ruling position, but having internalized the culture of the official class, they felt a sense of crisis and were unable to adapt to the changes brought by democracy. Unable to maintain face and keep up the false dignity of the official class, they turned to organized cultural villainy.

Through their own privileged media outlets, they have resorted to reporting using double standards, insults and prejudice. While they only spent a few days reporting on the source of Ma's fortune, worth NT$80 million (US$2.45 million), they are offering around-the-clock coverage of the scandal surrounding President Chen Shui-bian's son-in-law Chao Chien-ming .

When Ma goes jogging every morning he becomes an advocate for exercise for everyman, while Chen's inspection tours of southern Taiwan are construed as dereliction of duty.

Examples of how Taiwanese are insulted and discriminated against in the media abound. This is not enough, however, and they have announced that they will join hands with their old enemy the CCP to speed up the exodus of Taiwanese capital to China and hollow out Taiwan. They are even promoting Taiwanese agricultural exports to China to erode the DPP's stronghold in southern Taiwan.

Their goal is to help China annex Taiwan, whether they are in power or not. To them, Taiwan's democracy is but a symbol of their shameful loss of power. They cannot understand what democracy means to the Chinese people who live under the rule of the CCP. The official class cannot bear that its servants have stood up and wrested power from them. This also explains why pro-China media outlets led by the group of Chinese living in Taiwan are acting with the deadly frenzy of a pack of crazed dogs.

Related Articles:

The CCP Is Willing to Attack Taiwan and Implement Fascism to Protect Its Political Power

Taiwan 2012: What the Communist Invasion Plan Says About Communist China

CCP remains greedy and violent